My Nrx Broke Tonite 2024
Bassn Blvd reply :
There I was, fishing the last half hour of a tournament and one of my NRX's broke. My darn reel fell completely off in my hand during a cast. It seems the top part of the reel seat is stripped and won't tighten down to sufficiently hold the reel in place. Has anyone experienced this problem? Did Loomis consider it a manufacturer’s defect? I seem to recall this being a common problem when the NRX model first came out.
NorcalBassin reply :
Definitely a defect that should not require your wild card. I haven't had this happen to me yet... but I get a little nervous every time I read a report like this. What model was it?
Bassn Blvd reply :
^ 893c JWR. I'll call loomis in the morning. I'm sure (hope) they'll take care of it at no charge.
Gone_Phishin reply :
The NRX strikes again. Sorry to hear about that Bassn.
There are quite a few reel seat problems documented over at TT. It seems ShimLoomis won't publicly own-up to any of the QC issues with the NRX sticks. They even went so far as to say people are using the wrong reels on these sticks...what a joke.
This should be covered, as they have definitely dealt with this issue before.
Diablos reply :
They seem to use a modified minima skeleton seat.
The top part of the seat seems a little short and maybe there isn't enough bite there.
Hooligan reply :
Yeah, I've had it happen on mine three or sixteen times.
I've slowly started to move many of my NRX and have been fishing a custom that I found I've really, really liked. The rods are finished well and they're on either NFC or MHX blanks, and thus far I've not had issue. I'll still keep a handfull of my NRX rods, but for the price I can't do much better.
Delaware Valley Tackle reply :
Not sound like a broken record, but before dropping $250> on a factory rod, look into a quality custom build.
roadwarrior reply :
It's just unbelievable that G. Loomis would allow this to continue, especially with their flagship series.
I have NEVER had a single issue with IMX ot GLX. Very disappointing.
Hyrule Bass reply :
never broke one of my 30-40 dollar rods 
smalljaw67 reply :
I'm a loomis fan and I was planning on getting into the NRX series this season but over the winter I have heard so many stories of split cork, reel seats coming unglued, epoxy on guides being cracked that I really was afraid but I was still going to try one but what ended it for me was hearing these same complaints on replacement rods, some anglers going through more than one replacement and still having issues, that did it for me ever having one.
tomustang reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 12:20 AM, Red Earth said:never broke one of my 30-40 dollar rods
Probably more nrx's broken than ugly sticks 
NorcalBassin reply :
On 3/16/2012 at 1:43 PM, Bassn Blvd said:^ 893c JWR. I'll call loomis in the morning. I'm sure (hope) they'll take care of it at no charge.
That's my favorite rod and it's one of the models I've heard very little about regarding QC issues.
On 3/17/2012 at 12:20 AM, Red Earth said:never broke one of my 30-40 dollar rods
Me neither... I think I still have a couple Ugly Stiks from 10+ years ago that still work great despite some abuse.
On 3/17/2012 at 1:52 AM, Tom D. said:Probably more nrx's broken than ugly sticks
No doubt about it. If you run over an NRX, let the dog use it as a chew toy, or put it in the garbage disposal it will be ruined. I suppose that's a price you pay for such a leap in sensitivity.
J Francho reply :
I have an HONEST interest in how this turns out.
The moment it turns into a peeing contest about economy rods vs. high end rods, or whether anyone has to justify their purchases, the thread gets closed.
baluga reply :
i want my money back 
Gone_Phishin reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 1:39 AM, smalljaw67 said:I'm a loomis fan and I was planning on getting into the NRX series this season but over the winter I have heard so many stories of split cork, reel seats coming unglued, epoxy on guides being cracked that I really was afraid but I was still going to try one but what ended it for me was hearing these same complaints on replacement rods, some anglers going through more than one replacement and still having issues, that did it for me ever having one.
You hit the nail squarely on the head. There have been some people, who after being assured by Loomis customer service reps that all of the problems were fixed on their replacement rods, still receive problematic rods; and this has happened several times.
What angers me the most is Loomis has done little to none to publicly address this problem. It gives me no faith in purchasing a blemish/problem-free rod.
I have an 802C, and I have not had any problems with it.
tomustang reply :
Well there is one way to deplete a bad inventory and that is to replace the bad ones that come back, say only 100 out a 1000 are bad they aren't going to scrap them all, it's just their process to get rid of them
tomustang reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 3:48 AM, J Francho said:The moment it turns into a peeing contest about economy rods vs. high end rods, or whether anyone has to justify their purchases, the thread gets closed.
It was just a joke
Hooligan reply :
I've broken five NRX at, or slightly above, the reel seat. Only one of which was a replacement that broke. Overall, I'm still very happy with them, but like DVT states, the custom factor has begun to far outweigh what a stock rods can be had for. There are also custom builders, though, that are ridiculously overpriced.
Bassn Blvd reply :
I just spoke to ShimanoLommis and guess what? Thay are sending me a shipping lable and are replacing the rod free of charge. They are even paying for the shipping.
Customer service said they did have issues with the reel seat when the NRX series was first built but have since corrected the problem. Apparently my NRX's are from the original run. I'm surprised they haven't broken sooner, but then again I treat my rods better than with kid gloves.
Customer service also said Icould send in my other NRX that hasn't broken yet or hold onto it until it does break. I have to check the purchase date to see if I purchased it before they made the corrections.
I really enjoy fishing with the NRX, the sensitivity is beyond measurable. But like DVT said, they are expensive. I would considere a custom rod but I stopped building rods years ago and longer have any equipment nor have I kept up with who the reputable, good rod makers are in my area.
Hooligan reply :
Glad to hear they took care of you. I know they took care of me, as well as everyone I've ever talked to with the same issue. Going back and reading that people can't believe they haven't acknowledged the problem- They have, numerous times. Through, not only their customers and saying that, "Yes we had an issue with the initial runs" and through their presence on many forums on the internet. Bantam1 has offered much the same here previously.
Nay sayers will say nay, it's sour grapes rationale, I rather firmly believe that. Just like when many of us bought GLX and "the guide inserts were brittle" and things of that nature. Loomis fixed the issue, that by the way wasn't their issue, and righted the situation, as they did here.
POPRG reply :
Nice to hear they are owning up to their known flaws..,says a lot to me when a company admits a fault and offers to correct it,instead of blaming it on "user error"!
NorcalBassin reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 7:12 AM, Bassn Blvd said:I just spoke to ShimanoLommis and guess what? Thay are sending me a shipping lable and are replacing the rod free of charge. They are even paying for the shipping.
Awesome... that's exactly what they should do so it's nice seeing they're still offering that level of service.
Gone_Phishin reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 9:56 AM, Hooligan said:Glad to hear they took care of you. I know they took care of me, as well as everyone I've ever talked to with the same issue. Going back and reading that people can't believe they haven't acknowledged the problem- They have, numerous times. Through, not only their customers and saying that, "Yes we had an issue with the initial runs" and through their presence on many forums on the internet. Bantam1 has offered much the same here previously.
Nay sayers will say nay, it's sour grapes rationale, I rather firmly believe that. Just like when many of us bought GLX and "the guide inserts were brittle" and things of that nature. Loomis fixed the issue, that by the way wasn't their issue, and righted the situation, as they did here.
That's all they really owned up to. They have only specifically addressed the original problems. I've not heard anything about the countless rods with obvious cosmetic flaws. The QC on these flagship sticks are crap.
I am not a hater, as I own a NRX. I love my 802C, and it has a very specific place in my arsenal. That said, with the rampant lack of QC on $400-$500 sticks, I'll spend my money on future rods elsewhere.
I'm glad to hear the process has been painless Bassn.
flippin and pitchin reply :
Journalistic urination is now terminated. Great resolution.
Hooligan reply :
No, they've admitted some flawed finishes, bad guide wraps and the like. That was one of the first things said. I'm not out and out defending, just stating that I've seen as much. I've heard as much from people at the manufacturing and distribution levels as well as from people high enough in the company to never need to say it. In truth, I think that's one of the driving forces behind the green rod, too. Eliminate some of the bad feelings of the blues by not having those same issues with the green. I know I'm completely wrong about it, but the psychology of it does say a lot.
Gone_Phishin reply :
It's good to hear that they have. I don't recall reading about it, but i will take your word. 
I just really feel for the people who have had to send the same rod back four times. I've read about several people having to got through that. Most have reported the same runaround from the call center at Loomis: there won't be any more problems, as they have been fixed; etc.
jeb2 reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 6:15 AM, Tom D. said:Well there is one way to deplete a bad inventory and that is to replace the bad ones that come back, say only 100 out a 1000 are bad they aren't going to scrap them all, it's just their process to get rid of them
There has been some speculation to that effect, but I kind of doubt it. It's against federal law to refurb/remanf the product and not clearly label it as such. Hard to believe ShimLoomis would take that chance.
smalljaw67 reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 11:22 AM, Hooligan said:No, they've admitted some flawed finishes, bad guide wraps and the like. That was one of the first things said. I'm not out and out defending, just stating that I've seen as much. I've heard as much from people at the manufacturing and distribution levels as well as from people high enough in the company to never need to say it. In truth, I think that's one of the driving forces behind the green rod, too. Eliminate some of the bad feelings of the blues by not having those same issues with the green. I know I'm completely wrong about it, but the psychology of it does say a lot.
I'm sorry but I'm with Gone_Phishin on what he is saying and I maybe wrong but telling customers they had a bad run or having a rep on an internet forum addressing the problem is a long way from public admission of a problem. Another one of my concerns that I asked about was the green rods, are they a replacement for the first run with issues resolved? I was told they are just a different color for those that didn't like the blue color but reps have said different so who do you believe? I can't buy one when the company that is making them seem to be talking out both sides of their mouth. I have 5 Loomis rods ranging from GL3 to GLX and I wanted to try the NRX but depending on what day you call and who you talk to you can get wildly different explantions, like I said, a rep claimed the green rods were both a cosmetic upgrade but also to show anglers that the problem was fixed and then when you call they tell you that there wasn't any real problem and the color change was to adress the number of anglers that didn't like the blue color???? Who is telling the truth? I have come to the conclusion that I will never own one, in fact I've set my sites on an Edge rod that really is made by Gary Loomis without wondering if a blue rod is going to break or if a green rod won't break.
Hooligan reply :
On 3/17/2012 at 11:31 PM, smalljaw67 said:I'm sorry but I'm with Gone_Phishin on what he is saying and I maybe wrong but telling customers they had a bad run or having a rep on an internet forum addressing the problem is a long way from public admission of a problem. Another one of my concerns that I asked about was the green rods, are they a replacement for the first run with issues resolved? I was told they are just a different color for those that didn't like the blue color but reps have said different so who do you believe? I can't buy one when the company that is making them seem to be talking out both sides of their mouth. I have 5 Loomis rods ranging from GL3 to GLX and I wanted to try the NRX but depending on what day you call and who you talk to you can get wildly different explantions, like I said, a rep claimed the green rods were both a cosmetic upgrade but also to show anglers that the problem was fixed and then when you call they tell you that there wasn't any real problem and the color change was to adress the number of anglers that didn't like the blue color???? Who is telling the truth? I have come to the conclusion that I will never own one, in fact I've set my sites on an Edge rod that really is made by Gary Loomis without wondering if a blue rod is going to break or if a green rod won't break.
I guess I don't know how much more a public admission you get in today's day and age than having very highly placed employees of the company explaining the issues on a public forum and in other industry specific media. Should they broadcast it on every newscast world wide?
In terms of "reps" there are a HUGE number of sales representatives across the United States that don't work for Shimano American or Loomis. If they don't work for either of those companies they're going to tell you want they want you to hear, as well as what you want to hear. If you think otherwise you're 100% wrong. I trust no sales rep from any agency with the exception of a few folks like Everett Childs and John Lud, exceptional industry representatives that have huge names at stake if they're passing incorrect information. If Dan Thorburn tells me something, you're damned straight I'm going to believe him. He has NO reason to lie to me about it. None. If you're reading between the lines of things ike that, then it's just sad and silly, because at that point you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. It's pretty easy to know who to believe in the fishing industry, you look to those that have nothing to gain, rather than nothing to lose. Those people I've listed are those that have made statements about NRX issues, and one has nothing to gain from it because he has nothing to do with it other than he likes the rods.
Bassn Blvd reply :
I guess if all blue NRX rods were defected, then Loomis will be sending me a Green one. Not the case though. I don't believe the green replaces the blue. IMO it' just a different color to choose from. I believe the only rods that had reel seat problems were the ones produced during the first year or year and a half. They still sell the blue model, which has allegedly been fixed so I doubt the green one is a replacement.
In any case, sht happens. No one is perfect, but at least loomis is taking care of the problem and making me a satisfied customer.
jeb2 reply :
One of my green ones has a bunch of fit and finish issues, too. I'm also not sure what to beleive about the green replacing the blue, but I do know for a fact that the greens are certainly not defect free.
Quillback reply :
QC issues should be extremely rare on a $500 rod. I find it surprising that there are people on this thread that seem to accept it.
NorcalBassin reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 9:23 AM, Quillback said:QC issues should be extremely rare on a $500 rod. I find it surprising that there are people on this thread that seem to accept it.
Couldn't agree more. I fortunately bought both of mine on sale, but I wouldn't have expected these type of problems on even $50 rods. Hopefully they get it figured out pretty soon or this series is going to be an epic fail.
Bassn Blvd reply :
My two NRX's seem to be flawless, other than the one with the reel seat issue. I've had several GLX's and IMX's over the last 25 years and have never had any defects. Perhaps I'm one of the lucky ones.
DVT's suggestion about having your own custom rod made is a good idea. I use to build my own rods, both fresh and heavy/lt salt. I haven't built rods in over 15 years and haven't kept up on the latest trends/equipment.
Does anyone know if blanks can be purchased that are at least as sensitive and lightweight as the GLX, if not the NRX?
jeb2 reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 11:38 AM, Bassn Blvd said:My two NRX's seem to be flawless, other than the one with the reel seat issue.
Sorry, that just reads a little funny. Sounds like a 50% failure rate to me, not flawless.
Personally, of my 7 NRX's, I've had to have 5 replaced (one twice). All because of manufacturer defects. Love fishing with them, but sure wish they were as well built as the older rods.
QuoteI've had several GLX's and IMX's over the last 25 years and have never had any defects. Perhaps I'm one of the lucky ones.
I've got a few GLX's also. Never had any of these kinds of issues with them. And that seems to be what most report. Unfortunately, the NRX does not fall into that same quality built category.
QuoteDoes anyone know if blanks can be purchased that are at least as sensitive and lightweight as the GLX, if not the NRX?
Custom rod guys talk a lot about the blanks from Gary Loomis' new company, North Fork Tackle. You can have a Kistler custom built with those blanks. Only a one year warranty, though.
smalljaw67 reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 2:23 AM, Hooligan said:I guess I don't know how much more a public admission you get in today's day and age than having very highly placed employees of the company explaining the issues on a public forum and in other industry specific media. Should they broadcast it on every newscast world wide?
In terms of "reps" there are a HUGE number of sales representatives across the United States that don't work for Shimano American or Loomis. If they don't work for either of those companies they're going to tell you want they want you to hear, as well as what you want to hear. If you think otherwise you're 100% wrong. I trust no sales rep from any agency with the exception of a few folks like Everett Childs and John Lud, exceptional industry representatives that have huge names at stake if they're passing incorrect information. If Dan Thorburn tells me something, you're damned straight I'm going to believe him. He has NO reason to lie to me about it. None. If you're reading between the lines of things ike that, then it's just sad and silly, because at that point you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. It's pretty easy to know who to believe in the fishing industry, you look to those that have nothing to gain, rather than nothing to lose. Those people I've listed are those that have made statements about NRX issues, and one has nothing to gain from it because he has nothing to do with it other than he likes the rods.
Call it what you will but to this day they are accepting responsibility for 1% - 2% of the rods, the rest are just great???? A local dealer has told me every single casting rod he sold has either come back to him or was sent back directly to Loomis. If you accept them telling you 1% - 2% of the rods have minor issues then there isn't a problem but the rest of us aren't banking on lies, sorry. Why didn't they recall the first run they knew had problems? They could have easily put the info on their website saying NRX customers may experience problems, if so please contact us but they chose to answer questions in a forum that maybe all of their customers don't visit and you can't assume just because they fish enough to justify a high end rod that they visit multiple fishing forums. I hate areguing and I'm really glad you are happy with them, my problem is they are trying to downplay the scope of this and by making a statement of 1% of the rods have problems, well that tells me I need to watch because they are unwilling to admit the problem is much more widespread so I too may end up with a bad, but I don't know since they really aren't telling me much info at all and if I buy a rodfor that price I expect to use it, not keep running to a UPS store to send rods back and then wait for a replacement. And I find it strange that there are such unlucky individuals that have got more than one bad rod when after all it was only a 1% or 2% problem, those people better steer clear of cars or traffic in general. I commend you for defending something you truly believe in, I know I'm mad because I can't be on your side but I really want to be its just that I get insulted when a large company like that tells a bald face lie and expects me to be to stupid to add numbers and not be able to figure out they are giving me a line of garbage, in fact they have ruined my faith in them, I should have known Shimano was going to end up changing my opinion of an iconic brand.
Maico1 reply :
Just curious about this 1-2% return rate where did it come from, anyone know...Thank you
Quillback reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 11:03 PM, Maico1 said:Just curious about this 1-2% return rate where did it come from, anyone know...Thank you
Probably from the ShimLoomis propaganda department. From what I've seen it's is much higher. But even it it were 1-2%, that's inexcusable for a high end rod. Even minimal QC inspection of finished product should be able to catch the cosmetic issues. Trained monkeys could do a better job than ShimLoomis's QC department (assuming they even have one).
tomustang reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 10:38 PM, smalljaw67 said:I should have known Shimano was going to end up changing my opinion of an iconic brand.
It's been 15 years since their acquisition, your making it sound like it happened last year
jeb2 reply :
On 3/18/2012 at 11:03 PM, Maico1 said:Just curious about this 1-2% return rate where did it come from, anyone know...Thank you
Over on tackle tour, there's a sub-forum for "manufacturers support", or something close to that. The ShimLoomis rep there goes by the username "bantam1". He's on other sites as well. Anyway, if you research some of the NRX threads over there, you can find him claiming the 1-2% rate.
There's also a recent dicussion in that forum about a "new glx" where Bantam1 tells us Loomis is working hard on getting rid of the Xpeditor coverage altogether. Crafty the way they're going to work out from under it. But sure is a hose job for all those legacy Loomis rod owners. The warranty will still be in place, but not the service plan.
Bassn Blvd reply :
Jeb2- my mistake, when I said flawless I was refering to the wrap, color and finish.
What kind of issues have you had with yours?
Here's a thought we might take into consideration. I have seen and known several rod manufacturers use non-fishing people to wrap their rods. The wrappers are given the same size/length blank, a sheet of measurements and told to wrap each blank the same. These laborers get paid sometime less than minimum wage, ususally paid by the piece, so the faster they put a rod together the more they get paid.
I'm not saying Loomis is doing this with their flagship rod but I wonder what qualifications the person has who is assembling these NRX rods. I know this is Loomis' first time going to the split grip and from what I heard, that seems to be the biggest issue with the reel seat.
Here's my deal- I can assemble a rod that looks better than any of Loomis' rods and that fishes just as good , if not better. The problem is, I like their blanks and don't know where I can find them or a simular blank. The blanks, if sold to the public, probably cost a pretty penny and by the time you put all the hardware on it, youv'e spent close to what it cost for a manufactured one.
Quillback reply :
I read elsewhere that Dobyns and Lamiglass are coming out with rods using blanks made from the same resin technology that the NRX uses. Dobyns is actually field testing their rods first before releasing them for sale so I would not expect any bad glue issues, and I'd be surprised if any finish problems get shipped from Dobyns. I'd also like to see if any of the cutom builders can get these blanks. Maybe DVT will see this and weigh in.
jeb2 reply :
On 3/19/2012 at 12:51 AM, Bassn Blvd said:Jeb2- my mistake, when I said flawless I was refering to the wrap, color and finish.
Makes sense.
QuoteWhat kind of issues have you had with yours?
You know, I really need to add the issues up better. I'm sure it's more than 5.
Casting rods (803, 853(2), 893, 873, 854)
-803 broken tip on a cast 2nd time out.
-Replacement 803 reel seat let go, store gave me an 853 to replace it
-853 reel seat let go
-853 foregrip cork split
-893 had issues from the factory. Fit and finish issues ( http://www.jebruns.com/RodsReels/NRX893Scratches1.jpg ). Replacement has been good.
-853 rod tip broke while fishing with Quillback the other day. He can attest I was doing nothing abusive to the rod when it snapped.
Spinning rods (822S SYR,822S DSR):
-Fit and finish issues on the 822S SYR ( http://www.jebruns.com/RodsReels/NRX822SYR_QCIssues2.jpg )
So 7 issues so far, 6 requiring replacements. I should have sent the 822SYR back as it had other small issues like in the picture, but I figured my odds of getting anything better were at best a crap shoot. Hard to believe at these price points that we have to settle for this kind of crap. Not just me, either. If you follow some of the NRX threads on the fishing forums, there are many stories far worse than mine. I sure wish Loomis sold the NRX blank.
QuoteHere's a thought we might take into consideration. I have seen and known several rod manufacturers use non-fishing people to wrap their rods. The wrappers are given the same size/length blank, a sheet of measurements and told to wrap each blank the same. These laborers get paid sometime less than minimum wage, ususally paid by the piece, so the faster they put a rod together the more they get paid.
Someone else mentioned that on a different board, too. You'd sure as heck hope they wouldn't be doing that with the NRX's. But even if they were, you'd think any kind of even cursory inspection would catch some of this stuff. How can this junk get out of the factory? Crazy.
Bassn Blvd reply :
Wow, I see what you mean. They didn't even finish coating the guide on the blue one. Totaly unacceptable.
Does the hook keeper get in your way? I spend 3/4 of my time on the water flipping senkos and jigs underneath docks. The slack line somehow gets caught on the hook keeper after completing my flip/toss and it drives me fricking bananas.
Hooligan reply :
While I respect your stanpoint, Jeb, I'm sorry that I cannot agree with it. There are too many things that I've seen firsthand, in terms of the real rates of return, and in terms of their handling of it.
Gary Loomis was recently quoted as saying that, even though he has nothing to do with the company, the vast majority of issues that he's seen and read about in terms of breakage have been pliot error. The reel seat issue is a different story, and I don't deny that it's a pain to deal with.
In terms of fit and finish, I've not had that personally, and I've seen it on only one or two rods out of what must be several hundred I've had in my hands. I just have a hard time accepting that it is on a scale that has been presented here.
My primary reason for moving away from purchase of further NRX, as stated previously, is the advancements that are now available in the custom lineup that will better fit the gaps I'm in need of.
As stated previously I respect your opinion, but will politely disagree.
flippin and pitchin reply :
On 3/19/2012 at 1:10 AM, Quillback said:I read elsewhere that Dobyns and Lamiglass are coming out with rods using blanks made from the same resin technology that the NRX uses. Dobyns is actually field testing their rods first before releasing them for sale so I would not expect any bad glue issues, and I'd be surprised if any finish problems get shipped from Dobyns. I'd also like to see if any of the cutom builders can get these blanks. Maybe DVT will see this and weigh in.
Lamiglas is currently using nano resin technology in production rods for steelhead and salmon models. I spoke to a pro staffer on March 3rd and he shared that models in a new bass line are a year out,maybe a bit more. A designer told me the resin is very expensive and the chemical company has made it difficult to make it affordable because rod manufactures buy in very small amounts compaired to other industries. I'm expecting premium prices.
jeb2 reply :
On 3/19/2012 at 7:22 AM, Bassn Blvd said:Wow, I see what you mean. They didn't even finish coating the guide on the blue one. Totaly unacceptable.
Does the hook keeper get in your way? I spend 3/4 of my time on the water flipping senkos and jigs underneath docks. The slack line somehow gets caught on the hook keeper after completing my flip/toss and it drives me fricking bananas.
No, I don't have that issue. I really like the NRX hook holder. I fish a lot of t-rigs, c-rigs and t-rigged senkos and it allows me to not have to pull the point out of the bait each time I want to put the rod away. Saves time when going back to that rod to fish it again and it makes the baits last longer.
jeb2 reply :
On 3/19/2012 at 2:00 PM, Hooligan said:While I respect your stanpoint, Jeb, I'm sorry that I cannot agree with it. There are too many things that I've seen firsthand, in terms of the real rates of return, and in terms of their handling of it.
Gary Loomis was recently quoted as saying that, even though he has nothing to do with the company, the vast majority of issues that he's seen and read about in terms of breakage have been pliot error. The reel seat issue is a different story, and I don't deny that it's a pain to deal with.
In terms of fit and finish, I've not had that personally, and I've seen it on only one or two rods out of what must be several hundred I've had in my hands. I just have a hard time accepting that it is on a scale that has been presented here.
My primary reason for moving away from purchase of further NRX, as stated previously, is the advancements that are now available in the custom lineup that will better fit the gaps I'm in need of.
As stated previously I respect your opinion, but will politely disagree.
Not sure what you're disagreeing with. That the defect rate is higher than 1-2%? If so, that's fine. We all have to form our own opinion on that based on the information available to us. Like someone else in this thread, my local dealer told me a while back that every single NRX casting rod that they'd sold had come back at least once with cork splits or reel seat issues. There sure is a lot of information out there that makes the number look far bigger than 1-2%, IMO.
The fit and finish issues seem to be something new. I didn't have those issues with my older NRX's. There's one guy over on the other forum that had to have 4 rods in a row replaced, directly from ShimLoomis, because of some awful build issues. It's just incredible to me that these rods are making it out the door. Someone at Loomis had to have seen that and said "Ship it anyway". If not, they do not have an inspection process at all.
related Fishing Rods Reels Line Knots topic
most viewed Fishing Rods Reels Line Knots topic
© 2024 - fishing.qciss.net. All Rights Reserved.