What's up with this photo ??? 2024
Fish Chris reply :
Is this the "supposed" photo of GP's world record, that surfaced a couple years ago ? I found it on a Google photo search and it had no captions.
Either way, this is certainly a giant bass from the old days. It doesn't look like a super fat trout-eater (which of course, GP's bass would not have been) but it does have a massive frame, and looks like it could be 20'ish to me. 22-4 ? .....well, we all know how photos can be so misleading, to the high, or low side.....
Hmmmm. I dunno'...... But I'd take one like this today. How about you guys ? :-)
Anyone know more about this photo ?
Fish
Low_Budget_Hooker reply :
I've caught them that size,....but we call them stripers and yellowfin,lol
Hooked_On_Bass reply :
I'd take one! ;D
fishizzle reply :
Looks constipated to me
RoLo reply :
The car in that photo looks like a 1957 Ford Fairlane,
but George caught his bass in 1935...Imagine the odor 
Roger
Daniel My Brother reply :
Great fish...but that car in the background looks like a 1950's model, so I'm gonna guess that it's not Perry's fish.
Daniel My Brother reply :
Dang it RoLo! You beat me to it!
;D
Fish Chris reply :
Excellent point !
So then, since we are sure this isn't GP's fish, this makes me all the more curious what the scoop on this fish is ???
Hmmmm,
Fish
RoLo reply :
QuoteExcellent point !So then, since we are sure this isn't GP's fish, this makes me all the more curious what the scoop on this fish is ???
Hmmmm,
Fish
Truthfully Chris, there's no clear view of the angler's hand, which makes that photo a tad suspect 
Roger
Alpster reply :
The only pic I have seen that is purported to be the real fish is with a small kid and a buddy or uncle. Perry is not in the pic, but it is a massive bass. Like you said, Chris I would be OK with one that size. The 50s model car definitely rules this one out, but it's a real hawg anyway.
Ronnie
Gatorbassman reply :
This photo was found in the attic of a distant relative of George's so they tried to say it was of George's fish. But that's not George holding the fish and they don't know who the kid is. So there is still no proof that would hold up.
RoLo reply :
Actually that's me in that photo,
and that's my dad holding the bass he bought from my Uncle George.
They never told me what it weighed, they said it was a secret.
Alpster reply :
QuoteActually that's me in that photo,
and that's my dad holding the bass he bought from my Uncle George.
They never told me what it weighed, they said it was a secret.
I don't think even you or I are that old Roger, but it's a great story, and who's to say you wrong? 
Ronnie
Tin reply :
I watched a special on the World Record Bass a while back on one of the outdoor/espn shows (can't remember). But most people believe that the fish Perry weighed in was a Carp or Striper. :-/
flechero reply :
If I was holding Fish Chris' recent 17 lb. bass, would it not still be a 17 pounder, just because I was holding it? Would he still not be the one who caught it, just because he was behind the camera? I realize it's not "ideal" but there is no actual evidence to say Perry's fish was anything but legit, is there? I have no doubt that if GP had any idea that this would be such a huge debate later, he would have done a few things differently. If for no other reason than his reputation.
Alpster reply :
You can call it controversial or disputed or under documented or you can even call it a carp, but old George has still got the record until one of us beats it. Like it or not and believe it or not, it still stands. That's just the way it is and only a larger fish caught properly will change it. That's just the way it is.
Ronnie
RoLo reply :
QuoteQuoteActually that's me in that photo,
and that's my dad holding the bass he bought from my Uncle George.
They never told me what it weighed, they said it was a secret.
I don't think even you or I are that old Roger, but it's a great story, and who's to say you wrong?
Ronnie
Too many detectives, I can't get away with nothing around here 
;D
Gatorbassman reply :
What can be learned from that one photo of the guy and the kid holding the fish.
They say it was taken in front of the Post Office in Helena, GA.
So I look up the Post office address and come up with 612 Forsyth Ave.
I google earth it and check it on my GPS Program and I find out that Forsyth Ave runs from SW to NE and the Post Office is located on the SE side of the road.
So I look back at the photo and according to the length and direction of the shadows in the picture the picture was taken early in the morning. Between 7 and 8:30am. Sunrise was a 5:26am.
According to the ESPN story it takes them almost 1 hour to drive to Montgomery Lake.
According to a story in the Augusta Chronicle he went fishing because the fields were too wet to plow. So he called his fishing partner, Jack Page, and ask him to come and pick him up so they could go fishing. They drove 45min to the lake, fished for a little while, caught the monster fish, packed up the truck and drove 1 hour to the Helena Post Office that didn't open until 10am. (according to county records) And according to the picture all this happened before 8:30am.
It would be a very slim chance that the fish in the photo is the same fish that George caught.
This is just my observation with a little research but it still doesn't have me convinced.
Alpster reply :
QuoteWhat can be learned from that one photo of the guy and the kid holding the fish.They say it was taken in front of the Post Office in Helena, GA.
So I look up the Post office address and come up with 612 Forsyth Ave.
I google earth it and check it on my GPS Program and I find out that Forsyth Ave runs from SW to NE and the Post Office is located on the SE side of the road.
So I look back at the photo and according to the length and direction of the shadows in the picture the picture was taken early in the morning. Between 7 and 8:30am. Sunrise was a 5:26am.
According to the ESPN story it takes them almost 1 hour to drive to Montgomery Lake.
According to a story in the Augusta Chronicle he went fishing because the fields were too wet to plow. So he called his fishing partner, Jack Page, and ask him to come and pick him up so they could go fishing. They drove 45min to the lake, fished for a little while, caught the monster fish, packed up the truck and drove 1 hour to the Helena Post Office that didn't open until 10am. (according to county records) And according to the picture all this happened before 8:30am.
It would be a very slim chance that the fish in the photo is the same fish that George caught.
This is just my observation with a little research but it still doesn't have me convinced.
To muddy the water even more, the rural post office in Robert, LA. moved while I lived there, so post offices move and change location as the population grows sometimes. Also, if they headed out at 4:30 AM while it was raining (too wet to plow) they could of made the trip, fished a couple of hours and been back by 8:30. We will just have to believe George's story till we know better, I guess. It is fun to play C.S.I.
Ronnie
Bassin4Life55 reply :
Big fish. The info generated about this pic really shows the resource this forum can be.
flechero reply :
Well, since you can't ID the "road" from the pic... it could be the road, P.O. driveway or the driveway to another property all together. So actually you can't prove the direction or if it was a morning or late afternoon photo. Who knows, it could be a pic from that evening after they were home. The fish could have been on ice throughout the day.
Too many unknowns to prove or disprove anything, IMO.
Redlinerobert reply :
Hmmm, they don't show the guys feet. Could he have put one of his shoes in teh fish's gullet?
dman reply :
QuoteWhat can be learned from that one photo of the guy and the kid holding the fish.They say it was taken in front of the Post Office in Helena, GA.
So I look up the Post office address and come up with 612 Forsyth Ave.
I google earth it and check it on my GPS Program and I find out that Forsyth Ave runs from SW to NE and the Post Office is located on the SE side of the road.
So I look back at the photo and according to the length and direction of the shadows in the picture the picture was taken early in the morning. Between 7 and 8:30am. Sunrise was a 5:26am.
According to the ESPN story it takes them almost 1 hour to drive to Montgomery Lake.
According to a story in the Augusta Chronicle he went fishing because the fields were too wet to plow. So he called his fishing partner, Jack Page, and ask him to come and pick him up so they could go fishing. They drove 45min to the lake, fished for a little while, caught the monster fish, packed up the truck and drove 1 hour to the Helena Post Office that didn't open until 10am. (according to county records) And according to the picture all this happened before 8:30am.
It would be a very slim chance that the fish in the photo is the same fish that George caught.
This is just my observation with a little research but it still doesn't have me convinced.
Holy crap! u need to write for CSI!
Vyron reply :
whatever the story behind the 1st pic , still an awesome fish!!!!
I really enjoy looking at old fishing pictures
TheBeast reply :
QuoteWhat can be learned from that one photo of the guy and the kid holding the fish.They say it was taken in front of the Post Office in Helena, GA.
So I look up the Post office address and come up with 612 Forsyth Ave.
I google earth it and check it on my GPS Program and I find out that Forsyth Ave runs from SW to NE and the Post Office is located on the SE side of the road.
So I look back at the photo and according to the length and direction of the shadows in the picture the picture was taken early in the morning. Between 7 and 8:30am. Sunrise was a 5:26am.
According to the ESPN story it takes them almost 1 hour to drive to Montgomery Lake.
According to a story in the Augusta Chronicle he went fishing because the fields were too wet to plow. So he called his fishing partner, Jack Page, and ask him to come and pick him up so they could go fishing. They drove 45min to the lake, fished for a little while, caught the monster fish, packed up the truck and drove 1 hour to the Helena Post Office that didn't open until 10am. (according to county records) And according to the picture all this happened before 8:30am.
It would be a very slim chance that the fish in the photo is the same fish that George caught.
This is just my observation with a little research but it still doesn't have me convinced.
That's just to much work to put into saying that isn't George's fish. Who cares the fish in that pic is bigger than any Bass any of us on here have ever caught and like it or not it was caught evidenced by it beign in the pic. If that fish isn't 22+ it isn't an ounce.
basschaser66 reply :
Awesome bass!
Americangirl reply :
Ya'll are seriously cracking me up here, and i need mention you are GOOD! if i ever get in a bind and need some detective work done, i will be calling on you guys........
IneedAnewScreenName-3271 reply :
I remember we had a brand new 1957 Ford Fairlane hard top convertable.
I think it cost like $1,800 brand new.
OHHH, and the bass...any day I'd love to catch one a those.
RoLo reply :
QuoteI remember we had a brand new 1957 Ford Fairlane hard top convertable.I think it cost like $1,800 brand new.
My first car (shotrod) was a brand new 1961 Ford Starliner costing $2,700
(Overdrive 3:89 to 1 differential - 390 cu in engine - pushbutton radio) 8-)
Roger
Matt Fly reply :
What it really shows, is alot of different opinions without any real evidence, just opinions.
If it was that easy to dispell Georges record, it would have been done already long ago and the record would rest elsewhere with someone elses name attatched to it.
After all these years, 22.04 is still the mark in the books, and all the CSI isn't gonna change it.
surfer reply :
QuoteWell, since you can't ID the "road" from the pic... it could be the road, P.O. driveway or the driveway to another property all together. So actually you can't prove the direction or if it was a morning or late afternoon photo. Who knows, it could be a pic from that evening after they were home. The fish could have been on ice throughout the day.Too many unknowns to prove or disprove anything, IMO.
I might be showing my age, but we didn't have ice in 1935.
.dsaavedra. reply :
QuoteIf I was holding Fish Chris' recent 17 lb. bass, would it not still be a 17 pounder, just because I was holding it? Would he still not be the one who caught it, just because he was behind the camera? I realize it's not "ideal" but there is no actual evidence to say Perry's fish was anything but legit, is there? I have no doubt that if GP had any idea that this would be such a huge debate later, he would have done a few things differently. If for no other reason than his reputation.
a great point!
for example, we all know that Mac Weakly caught and released that 25.1lb bass out at Dixon Lake. wellllllllllll, in the pic that we are all familiar with, Mac's buddy, Mike Winn is holding the fish, not Mac.
with that being said, those photos are some AMAZING BASS!!!
i really have no contribution to the controversy, i dont care who's bass those are and where they came from because they are awesome!
my view on this: lets not try to put down others' great catches and instead, lets admire them! George Perry's 22.4 is still in the books and it will be till someone beats it.
nuff said :-X
LooksLikeSinbad reply :
Chris -
Do you have the original url of the photo? If not, do you remember what you searched for on google to find it?
Fish Chris reply :
No, sorry. I think I did a search for "huge bass".... or something of that nature.
Peace,
Fish
related General Bass Fishing Forum topic
next topic
most viewed General Bass Fishing Forum topic
© 2024 - fishing.qciss.net. All Rights Reserved.